Skip to main content

The planned Panhandle Freeway of San Francisco (Interstate 80)

By

The Panhandle Freeway was an approximately two-mile limited access corridor which was once proposed in the city of San Francisco.  The Panhandle Freeway conceptually would have connected US Route 101 at the Central Freeway west to the planned Interstate 280 freeway by way of Panhandle Park.  The concept of the Panhandle Freeway was added to the State Highway System as Legislative Route Number 223 during 1947.  The adopted alignment of the Panhandle Freeway corridor rescinded in 1955 and was never reestablished.  Between 1964-1968 the Panhandle Freeway was planned as Interstate 80 and later as the second iteration of California State Route 241 circa 1968-1972. 


The history of the planned Panhandle Freeway

The beginnings of the Panhandle Freeway and Central Freeway being added to the State Highway System came with the addition of LRN 223 by way of 1947 Legislative Chapter 11.  LRN 223 was defined as "a point on LRN 2 near Division Street to LRN 56." 

LRN 223 appears as a proposed highway for the first time on the 1948 Division of Highways Map.



The 1948 Transportation Plan for San Francisco included the concept for the Panhandle Freeway.  The Panhandle Freeway as originally conceived began at the Central Freeway.  The corridor was located through Panhandle Park between Haight Street and McAllister Street.  Upon reaching Golden Gate Park the Panhandle Freeway terminated and split into couplets.  The couplets are displayed as Richmond Freeway and Sunset Freeway.


The September/October 1953 California Highways & Public Works announced a leg of the Central Freeway was submitted as a recommended project during September 1954 California Highway Commission meeting.  The article notes the first Central Freeway segment was 0.9 miles long extending from 13th/Mission Street to vicinity of Turk Street.  The Central Freeway/Panhandle Freeway combined corridor is noted to be part of LRN 223 and LRN 2.  The article depicts the Bayshore Freeway designation as being planned to end at Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway is described as a 2.3-mile limited access corridor which would connect LRN 2 at the Central Freeway to LRN 56 (California State Route 1).  The purpose of the Panhandle Freeway was to act as a bypass for traffic more easily access the Golden Gate Bridge in addition to serving the neighborhoods of Richmond and Sunset.    





The 1954 Division of Highways Map depicts the newly completed segment of the Bayshore Freeway to Bryant Street in San Francisco.  Mainline US Route 101 is shown relocated from Potrero Avenue onto the new freeway segment to Bryant Street.  US Route 101 was carried to 10th Street via the Bryant Street ramp.  Part of LRN 223 is shown connecting the extending from the constructed part of the Bayshore Freeway west to Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway west to LRN 56 is shown with a more defined alignment following Lincoln Way. 


During 1955 the Panhandle Freeway corridor adoption was deleted from the San Francisco trafficways plan.  The corridor was noted to be "deleted, pending further study." 

The completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyline interchange was featured on the cover of the March/April 1955 California Highways & Public Works.  US Route 101 transitioned from the northern of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway towards Mission Street.  The beginning of the San Francisco Skyline carried US Route 40 and US Route 50 towards the Bay Bridge.  It isn't fully clear when the Central Freeway designation was extended beyond Mission Street to the Bayshore Freeway/San Francisco Skyway junction. 


The July/August 1955 California Highways & Public Works noted the Central Freeway opened from the Bayshore Freeway to Mission Street on March 1, 1955.  The Bayshore Freeway is noted to have been opened from Alemany Boulevard to 3rd Street on March 30, 1955.  The San Francisco Skyway from the Bayshore Freeway to the Bay Bridge is noted to have opened on June 14, 1955.  






The 1956 Division of Highways Map displayed the completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyway interchange.  US Route 101 is shown to be realigned from the end of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway and Mission Street towards Van Ness Avenue.  The Central Freeway is shown to be fully a component of LRN 2.  The Panhandle Freeway is shown reverted to a proposed highway with an undetermined routing. 


The Panhandle Freeway was rebranded as the "Western Freeway" in 1956.  Planners proposed an elevated iteration of the Western Freeway during said year which would branch from LRN 56 at 19th Avenue.  The elevated proposal was ultimately rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in an 8-3 vote.  

The Division of Highways proposed a depressed iteration of the Western Freeway in 1960.  The corridor was again rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in a 6-5 vote in 1962. 

As part of the 1964 State Highway Renumbering the Legislative Route Numbers were dropped in favor of Sign Route designations.  LRN 223 and the planned Western Freeway were consolidated into the legislative corridor of Interstate 80.  The Western Freeway corridor appears as planned Interstate 80 on the 1964 Division of Highways Map.  



The May/June 1964 California Highway & Public Works provided an update to the now rebranded "Panhandle Parkway" in San Francisco.  A public hearing was held on April 6, 1964, resulted in the city requesting a study alternative for a Crosstown Tunnel under Panhandle Park.  



The May/June 1965 California Highways & Public Works provided an update regarding the status of the Panhandle Parkway.  The latest corridor presented by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors had been rejected during October 1964 by a 6-5 vote.  The Board of Supervisors fully objected to the prospect of constructing the corridor through the proposed Crosstown Tunnel.  Following the rejection the California Highway Commission decided against adopting an alignment.


The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted against the Panhandle Parkway 6-5 for a final time on March 21, 1966.  1968 Legislative Chapter 282 transferred the planned Panhandle Parkway from Interstate 80 to the second iteration of California State Route 241.  The corridor appears as planned California State Route 241 on the 1969 Division of Highways Map.  



1972 Legislative Chapter 1216 deleted California State Route 241 and by proxy the planned Panhandle Parkway.  The corridor does not appear on the 1975 Caltrans Map.  


Labels:

Comments

COOLTRAINER Allison said…
Does the naming of Lincoln Way have anything to do with the Lincoln Highway? I know about the Lincoln Highway terminus marker in Lincoln Park, but Lincoln Way always stood out to me since it breaks the alphabetic naming of those streets on the west side (should be an "H" name, before "Irving"). These early maps with LRN223 along Lincoln Way make me wonder even more.
3:06 PM
Challenger Tom said…
No, the Lincoln Highway was always north of Golden Gate Park. The Lincoln Highway Association still maintains a map:

https://www.lincolnhighwayassoc.org/map/
12:08 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bleriot Ferry - Alberta

By
  Alberta operates six ferries scattered throughout the province. Roughly twenty to twenty-five kilometers up the Red Deer River from the town of Drumheller is one of the most scenic ferry crossings in all of Wild Rose Country, the Bleriot Ferry. Using the North Dinosaur Trail (Alberta Highway 838, or AB 838), the Bleriot Ferry provides a scenic river cruise of sorts in the Canadian Badlands. The Bleriot Ferry started operating in 1913 as the Munson Ferry when a few bridges crossed the Red Deer River. The ferry was started by Andre Bleriot, the brother of famed early aviator Louis Bleriot, who became famous for being the first person to fly over the English Channel. At the time, the Alberta provincial government commissioned local residents to run the ferries. There were several ferries along the Red Deer River, and not only did they serve as vital transportation links, but they also served as local social hubs, since everyone had to take the ferries to go places. Over time, as the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Pollasky Bridge

By
The Pollasky Bridge near modern day Friant is a ruined highway bridge which was completed during early 1906 as part of the Fresno-Fresno Flats Road.  The structure is one of the oldest known arch concrete spans to have been constructed in California.  The bridge briefly carried California State Route 41 following the destruction of the Lanes Bridge in 1940.  The Pollasky Bridge itself was destroyed by flooding during 1951, but the ruins can still be found on the Madera County side of the San Joaquin River.   Pictured as the blog cover is the Pollasky Bridge as it was featured in the 1913 book "The Concrete Bridge."  The structure can be seen crossing the San Joaquin River near Friant below on the 1922 United States Geological Survey Map.   Part 1; the history of the Pollasky Bridge The Pollasky Bridge site is near modern day Friant of Fresno County.  The community of Friant was established as Converse Ferry during 1852 on the San Joaquin Rive...
1 comment
Read more

I-73/I-74 and NC Future Interstates Year in Review 2024

By
Welcome to another annual review of progress in constructing North Carolina's New and Future Interstate routes. While 2024 was not too exciting, with no new segments of major routes opening, there was 1 new interstate signing, another proposed new interstate route, and the near opening of a new segment for 2 routes. As tradition, I will start off with a review of what happened with I-73 and I-74 and then move on to the major news of the year about the other new and future routes. Work continued on the I-73/I-74 Rockingham Bypass through the year. The last few months have been hoping for news of its opening before 2025, without luck. Signs of its near completion included the placement of new signs, many with interstate shields uncovered, along the Bypass and intersecting roadways. For example, these went up along US 74 East: Overhead signage at Business 74 exit which contains the future ramp to I-73 North/I-74 West. Signage was also updated heading west on US 74 approaching the unop...
Post a Comment
Read more