Skip to main content

The planned Panhandle Freeway of San Francisco (Interstate 80)

By

The Panhandle Freeway was an approximately two-mile limited access corridor which was once proposed in the city of San Francisco.  The Panhandle Freeway conceptually would have connected US Route 101 at the Central Freeway west to the planned Interstate 280 freeway by way of Panhandle Park.  The concept of the Panhandle Freeway was added to the State Highway System as Legislative Route Number 223 during 1947.  The adopted alignment of the Panhandle Freeway corridor rescinded in 1955 and was never reestablished.  Between 1964-1968 the Panhandle Freeway was planned as Interstate 80 and later as the second iteration of California State Route 241 circa 1968-1972. 


The history of the planned Panhandle Freeway

The beginnings of the Panhandle Freeway and Central Freeway being added to the State Highway System came with the addition of LRN 223 by way of 1947 Legislative Chapter 11.  LRN 223 was defined as "a point on LRN 2 near Division Street to LRN 56." 

LRN 223 appears as a proposed highway for the first time on the 1948 Division of Highways Map.



The 1948 Transportation Plan for San Francisco included the concept for the Panhandle Freeway.  The Panhandle Freeway as originally conceived began at the Central Freeway.  The corridor was located through Panhandle Park between Haight Street and McAllister Street.  Upon reaching Golden Gate Park the Panhandle Freeway terminated and split into couplets.  The couplets are displayed as Richmond Freeway and Sunset Freeway.


The September/October 1953 California Highways & Public Works announced a leg of the Central Freeway was submitted as a recommended project during September 1954 California Highway Commission meeting.  The article notes the first Central Freeway segment was 0.9 miles long extending from 13th/Mission Street to vicinity of Turk Street.  The Central Freeway/Panhandle Freeway combined corridor is noted to be part of LRN 223 and LRN 2.  The article depicts the Bayshore Freeway designation as being planned to end at Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway is described as a 2.3-mile limited access corridor which would connect LRN 2 at the Central Freeway to LRN 56 (California State Route 1).  The purpose of the Panhandle Freeway was to act as a bypass for traffic more easily access the Golden Gate Bridge in addition to serving the neighborhoods of Richmond and Sunset.    





The 1954 Division of Highways Map depicts the newly completed segment of the Bayshore Freeway to Bryant Street in San Francisco.  Mainline US Route 101 is shown relocated from Potrero Avenue onto the new freeway segment to Bryant Street.  US Route 101 was carried to 10th Street via the Bryant Street ramp.  Part of LRN 223 is shown connecting the extending from the constructed part of the Bayshore Freeway west to Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway west to LRN 56 is shown with a more defined alignment following Lincoln Way. 


During 1955 the Panhandle Freeway corridor adoption was deleted from the San Francisco trafficways plan.  The corridor was noted to be "deleted, pending further study." 

The completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyline interchange was featured on the cover of the March/April 1955 California Highways & Public Works.  US Route 101 transitioned from the northern of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway towards Mission Street.  The beginning of the San Francisco Skyline carried US Route 40 and US Route 50 towards the Bay Bridge.  It isn't fully clear when the Central Freeway designation was extended beyond Mission Street to the Bayshore Freeway/San Francisco Skyway junction. 


The July/August 1955 California Highways & Public Works noted the Central Freeway opened from the Bayshore Freeway to Mission Street on March 1, 1955.  The Bayshore Freeway is noted to have been opened from Alemany Boulevard to 3rd Street on March 30, 1955.  The San Francisco Skyway from the Bayshore Freeway to the Bay Bridge is noted to have opened on June 14, 1955.  






The 1956 Division of Highways Map displayed the completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyway interchange.  US Route 101 is shown to be realigned from the end of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway and Mission Street towards Van Ness Avenue.  The Central Freeway is shown to be fully a component of LRN 2.  The Panhandle Freeway is shown reverted to a proposed highway with an undetermined routing. 


The Panhandle Freeway was rebranded as the "Western Freeway" in 1956.  Planners proposed an elevated iteration of the Western Freeway during said year which would branch from LRN 56 at 19th Avenue.  The elevated proposal was ultimately rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in an 8-3 vote.  

The Division of Highways proposed a depressed iteration of the Western Freeway in 1960.  The corridor was again rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in a 6-5 vote in 1962. 

As part of the 1964 State Highway Renumbering the Legislative Route Numbers were dropped in favor of Sign Route designations.  LRN 223 and the planned Western Freeway were consolidated into the legislative corridor of Interstate 80.  The Western Freeway corridor appears as planned Interstate 80 on the 1964 Division of Highways Map.  



The May/June 1964 California Highway & Public Works provided an update to the now rebranded "Panhandle Parkway" in San Francisco.  A public hearing was held on April 6, 1964, resulted in the city requesting a study alternative for a Crosstown Tunnel under Panhandle Park.  



The May/June 1965 California Highways & Public Works provided an update regarding the status of the Panhandle Parkway.  The latest corridor presented by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors had been rejected during October 1964 by a 6-5 vote.  The Board of Supervisors fully objected to the prospect of constructing the corridor through the proposed Crosstown Tunnel.  Following the rejection the California Highway Commission decided against adopting an alignment.


The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted against the Panhandle Parkway 6-5 for a final time on March 21, 1966.  1968 Legislative Chapter 282 transferred the planned Panhandle Parkway from Interstate 80 to the second iteration of California State Route 241.  The corridor appears as planned California State Route 241 on the 1969 Division of Highways Map.  



1972 Legislative Chapter 1216 deleted California State Route 241 and by proxy the planned Panhandle Parkway.  The corridor does not appear on the 1975 Caltrans Map.  


Labels:

Comments

COOLTRAINER Allison said…
Does the naming of Lincoln Way have anything to do with the Lincoln Highway? I know about the Lincoln Highway terminus marker in Lincoln Park, but Lincoln Way always stood out to me since it breaks the alphabetic naming of those streets on the west side (should be an "H" name, before "Irving"). These early maps with LRN223 along Lincoln Way make me wonder even more.
3:06 PM
Challenger Tom said…
No, the Lincoln Highway was always north of Golden Gate Park. The Lincoln Highway Association still maintains a map:

https://www.lincolnhighwayassoc.org/map/
12:08 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interstate 40's Tumultuous Ride Through the Pigeon River Gorge

By
In the nearly 60 years Interstate 40 has been open to traffic through the Pigeon River Gorge in the mountains of Western North Carolina, it has been troubled by frequent rockslides and damaging flooding, which has seen the over 30-mile stretch through North Carolina and Tennessee closed for months at a time. Most recently, excessive rainfall from Hurricane Helene in September 2024 saw sections of Interstate 40 wash away into a raging Pigeon River. While the physical troubles of Interstate 40 are well known, how I-40 came to be through the area is a tale of its own. Interstate 40 West through Haywood County near mile marker 10. I-40's route through the Pigeon River Gorge dates to local political squabbles in the 1940s and a state highway law written in 1921. A small note appeared in the July 28, 1945, Asheville Times. It read that the North Carolina State Highway Commission had authorized a feasibility study of a "...water-level road down [the] Pigeon River to the Tennessee l...
4 comments
Read more

Massena Center Suspension Bridge

By
The Massena Center Bridge, also known as the Holton D. Robinson Bridge, has had quite the tumultuous history. Situated on the Grasse River just east of Massena, New York in the hamlet of Massena Center, the Massena Center Bridge is a reminder of the efforts the community has made in order to connect over the river. The first and only other known bridge to be built at Massena Center was built in 1832, but that bridge was never long for this world. During the spring of 1833, the Grasse River dammed itself due to an ice dam, flooded and lifted the bridge off its foundation, destroying the bridge in the process.  The floods were frequent in the river during the spring, often backing up the river from Hogansburg and past Massena Center, but not to nearby Massena. After the first bridge disappeared, local residents had to resort to traveling seven miles west to Massena to cross the next closest bridge, and that was no easy task for a horse and buggy. However, it was many decades befo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dead Man's Curve of Interstate 90 and Innerbelt Freeway in Cleveland

By
"Dead Man's Curve" refers to the transition ramp Interstate 90 takes between Cleveland Memorial Shoreway onto the Innerbelt Freeway in downtown Cleveland, Ohio.  Said curve includes a sharp transition between the two freeways which is known for a high rate of accidents.  Currently the curve (not officially named) has a 35 MPH advisory speed and numerous safety features intended to mitigate crashes.  When the Interstate System was first conceived during 1956, Interstate 90 was intended to use the entirety Cleveland Memorial Shoreway and connect to the Northwest Freeway through Lakewood.  The Innerbelt Freeway was initially planned as the northernmost segment of Interstate 71.  The extension of Cleveland Memorial Shoreway west of Edgewater Park was never constructed which led to Interstate 90 being routed through the Innerbelt Freeway.   Part 1; the history of Cleveland's Innerbelt Freeway and Deadman's Curve The Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 was signe...
Post a Comment
Read more